Clear Film Adhesion Barrier Use at Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Analysis
TL;DRAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the use of a carboxymethylcellulose-hyaluronate adhesion barrier (Seprafilm) at the time of Cesarean section.\nDesign: Retrospective cohort study. \nSetting: A tertiary care center in Boston, MA, USA.\nPopulation: All women who underwent Cesarean section between the years 2006-2010 and returned for a second pelvic surgical procedure. \nMethods: All patients who had a Seprafilm barrier placed at the first (index) Cesarean section were matched on a 2:1 basis to those who had no barrier. Effectiveness and surgical outcomes were compared with Chi Square and Wilcoxon tests. Confounders were identified and controlled with logistic regression models. \nMain Outcome Measures: The location and severity of pelvic adhesions at the follow-up pelvic surgery.\nResults: Seventy-seven women who had Seprafilm placed at the index delivery were matched to 154 controls who received no barrier. The two groups had similar rates of any dense adhesions (43% and 42% respectively, p=.78)
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Objective: To evaluate the use of a carboxymethylcellulose-hyaluronate adhesion barrier (Seprafilm) at the time of Cesarean section.\nDesign: Retrospective cohort study. \nSetting: A tertiary care center in Boston, MA, USA.\nPopulation: All women who underwent Cesarean section between the years 2006-2010 and returned for a second pelvic surgical procedure. \nMethods: All patients who had a Seprafilm barrier placed at the first (index) Cesarean section were matched on a 2:1 basis to those who had no barrier. Effectiveness and surgical outcomes were compared with Chi Square and Wilcoxon tests. Confounders were identified and controlled with logistic regression models. \nMain Outcome Measures: The location and severity of pelvic adhesions at the follow-up pelvic surgery.\nResults: Seventy-seven women who had Seprafilm placed at the index delivery were matched to 154 controls who received no barrier. The two groups had similar rates of any dense adhesions (43% and 42% respectively, p=.78)
Keywords
Chat
Click to start Chat