TL;DRAbstract
The threatened ballistic missile attack upon Syria by the United States, in retaliation for the Syrian government’s use of chemical warfare against its own people, has elicited opinions from international lawyers and scholars on the question whether such an attack would violate international law. Invariably the legal source that is cited is Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter. The language of Article 2(4), because it stands alone and is not tied to nor dependent upon any of the other provisions of the UN Charter, is perhaps the most important rule of international law in the modern era.
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
The threatened ballistic missile attack upon Syria by the United States, in retaliation for the Syrian government’s use of chemical warfare against its own people, has elicited opinions from international lawyers and scholars on the question whether such an attack would violate international law. Invariably the legal source that is cited is Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter. The language of Article 2(4), because it stands alone and is not tied to nor dependent upon any of the other provisions of the UN Charter, is perhaps the most important rule of international law in the modern era.
Keywords
Chat
Click to start Chat