User Settings

Rate, Composition and Efficiency of Growth in Lean and Obese Pigs

Paul J. Côté,P. J. Wangsness-1978-08-01-Journal of Animal Science
14

TL;DRAbstract

The rate, composition, and efficiency of growth were determined for lean (Yorkshire) and genetically obese (feral-Ossabaw) pigs by use of body balance methods. Eight lean and eight obese pigs were sacrificed at 3 days of age and another five lean and six obese pigs were fed ad libitum a substitute sow's milk to approximately 26 days of age, and then a starter ration fed until sacrifice at 8 weeks of age. Lean pigs consumed more total gross energy (GE) (76.6 vs 49.0 Meal, P<01) and gained more live weight (11.0 vs 7.0 kg, P<.05), than obese pigs. Feed/gain was the same for both pig types. Percent body fat was greater in obese pigs at 3 days (3.3 vs 2.2%, P<.05) and at 8 weeks (13.6 vs 7.7%, P<.01), but percent body protein was the same in both pig types at 3 days (16%) and at 8 weeks (17.5%). The greater live weight gain of the lean pig was due primarily to its greater protein gain (PG) (1.61 vs 1.08 kg, P<05). Total fat gain (FG) and energy gain (EG) were similar for both pig types. Th

Chat with Paper

AI Agents for this Paper

The rate, composition, and efficiency of growth were determined for lean (Yorkshire) and genetically obese (feral-Ossabaw) pigs by use of body balance methods. Eight lean and eight obese pigs were sacrificed at 3 days of age and another five lean and six obese pigs were fed ad libitum a substitute sow's milk to approximately 26 days of age, and then a starter ration fed until sacrifice at 8 weeks of age. Lean pigs consumed more total gross energy (GE) (76.6 vs 49.0 Meal, P<01) and gained more live weight (11.0 vs 7.0 kg, P<.05), than obese pigs. Feed/gain was the same for both pig types. Percent body fat was greater in obese pigs at 3 days (3.3 vs 2.2%, P<.05) and at 8 weeks (13.6 vs 7.7%, P<.01), but percent body protein was the same in both pig types at 3 days (16%) and at 8 weeks (17.5%). The greater live weight gain of the lean pig was due primarily to its greater protein gain (PG) (1.61 vs 1.08 kg, P<05). Total fat gain (FG) and energy gain (EG) were similar for both pig types. Th

Keywords

Weight gainAnimal scienceDry matterLean body massFeed conversion ratioMealComposition (language)Starter

Chat

Click to start Chat