User Settings

SU‐E‐T‐541: Measurement of CT Density Model Variations and the Impact On the Accuracy of Monte Carlo (MC) Dose Calculation in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer

0

TL;DRAbstract

Purpose: To measure the CT density model variations between different CT scanners used for treatment planning and impact on the accuracy of MC dose calculation in lung SBRT. Methods: A Gammex electron density phantom (RMI 465) was scanned on two 64‐slice CT scanners (GE LightSpeed VCT64) and a 16‐slice CT (Philips Brilliance Big Bore CT). All three scanners had been used to acquire CT for CyberKnife lung SBRT treatment planning. To minimize the influences of beam hardening and scatter for improving reproducibility, three scans were acquired with the phantom rotated 120° between scans. The mean CT HU of each density insert, averaged over the three scans, was used to build the CT density models. For 14 patient plans, repeat MC dose calculations were performed by using the scanner‐specific CT density models and compared to a baseline CT density model in the base plans. All dose re‐calculations were done using the same plan beam configurations and MUs. Comparisons of dosimetric parameters

Chat with Paper

AI Agents for this Paper

Purpose: To measure the CT density model variations between different CT scanners used for treatment planning and impact on the accuracy of MC dose calculation in lung SBRT. Methods: A Gammex electron density phantom (RMI 465) was scanned on two 64‐slice CT scanners (GE LightSpeed VCT64) and a 16‐slice CT (Philips Brilliance Big Bore CT). All three scanners had been used to acquire CT for CyberKnife lung SBRT treatment planning. To minimize the influences of beam hardening and scatter for improving reproducibility, three scans were acquired with the phantom rotated 120° between scans. The mean CT HU of each density insert, averaged over the three scans, was used to build the CT density models. For 14 patient plans, repeat MC dose calculations were performed by using the scanner‐specific CT density models and compared to a baseline CT density model in the base plans. All dose re‐calculations were done using the same plan beam configurations and MUs. Comparisons of dosimetric parameters

Keywords

Nuclear medicineImaging phantomCyberknifeRadiation treatment planningMedicineScannerDose profileMonte Carlo method

Chat

Click to start Chat