Open AccessArticle
Los Angeles County Flood Control Dist. v. Southern California Edison Co. [DISSENT]
0PDF
TL;DRAbstract
By accepting a franchise right in public streets, a utility was subject to an implied obligation to relocate its facilities at its own expense when necessary to make way for the laying of storm drains by a flood control district.
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
By accepting a franchise right in public streets, a utility was subject to an implied obligation to relocate its facilities at its own expense when necessary to make way for the laying of storm drains by a flood control district.
Keywords
DissentFlood mythFlood controlGeographyPolitical scienceArchaeologyLaw
Chat
Click to start Chat