User Settings
Open AccessArticle10.1016/j.amdi.2014.09.005

Violations to the Principle of Non-Refoulement Under the Asylum Policy of the United States

Shirley Llain Arenilla-2015-01-01-Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional

TL;DRAbstract

This paper provides a critical analysis of the ongoing asylum policy of the United States, as the largest receptor of asylum claims in the industrialized world, to explain how it violates the principle of Non- Refoulement established in Article 33 of the 1951 Convention of Relating to the Status of Refugees and the1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees. The study will focus on the context of the treatment the United States gives to asylum seekers who arrive by sea or other means, expedited removal proceedings, the anti-terrorism measures as exception to the Principle of Non-Refoulement, and the restrictive interpretation of the Refugee concept.

Chat with Paper

AI Agents for this Paper

This paper provides a critical analysis of the ongoing asylum policy of the United States, as the largest receptor of asylum claims in the industrialized world, to explain how it violates the principle of Non- Refoulement established in Article 33 of the 1951 Convention of Relating to the Status of Refugees and the1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees. The study will focus on the context of the treatment the United States gives to asylum seekers who arrive by sea or other means, expedited removal proceedings, the anti-terrorism measures as exception to the Principle of Non-Refoulement, and the restrictive interpretation of the Refugee concept.

Keywords

RefugeeConventionContext (archaeology)Interpretation (philosophy)TerrorismPolitical scienceCriminologyLaw

Chat

Click to start Chat