Motivating Cosmopolitanism: A Political Critique

TL;DRAbstract

This thesis defends a political version of the normative motivational critique of cosmopolitanism (hereafter NMC). It is a shared view by both proponents and critics of cosmopolitanism that this moral theory suffers from a ‘motivational gap’, i.e., the fact that people in general do not seem to be motivated to act in the way cosmopolitan theory prescribes.. This thesis aims to answer the following research questions: what, if any, is the normative significance of cosmopolitanism’s motivational gap? Could there be a plausible version of the normative motivational critique, and, if it exists, what will be its implications for cosmopolitan theory? Through framing this discussion in recent methodological debates on the role of facts in normative political theory, and an analytical distinction between the different variations of the NMC, this thesis argues that a robust and plausible NMC is possible. While it rejects the meta-ethical version, which views motivational capabilities of individ

Chat with Paper

AI Agents for this Paper