TL;DRAbstract
In Chapter 6 I defended the merits of a variable geometry design for citizenship. Underlying such a design is the belief that exclusion, subordination and discrimination are impossible to reconcile with the principle of equal citizenship and that flexible arrangements are needed in order to tackle inequality, multifaceted exclusion and cumulative disadvantages. In this chapter, I will attempt to link the normative template and the theoretical issues pursued in previous chapters with matters of public policy and public service delivery. Guided by what has been argued thus far in the context of both the design of denationalised citizenship and the variable geometry paradigm, and reflecting on existing policies and institutional cultures, the discussion in this chapter will centre on institutional frameworks for minority incorporation and on proposals for policy reform.
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
In Chapter 6 I defended the merits of a variable geometry design for citizenship. Underlying such a design is the belief that exclusion, subordination and discrimination are impossible to reconcile with the principle of equal citizenship and that flexible arrangements are needed in order to tackle inequality, multifaceted exclusion and cumulative disadvantages. In this chapter, I will attempt to link the normative template and the theoretical issues pursued in previous chapters with matters of public policy and public service delivery. Guided by what has been argued thus far in the context of both the design of denationalised citizenship and the variable geometry paradigm, and reflecting on existing policies and institutional cultures, the discussion in this chapter will centre on institutional frameworks for minority incorporation and on proposals for policy reform.
Keywords
Chat
Click to start Chat