Cultures in Conflict? Re-evaluating the 'Clash of Civilizations' Thesis After 9/11

TL;DRAbstract

In this chapter, the author finds that ultimately Samuel Huntington's thesis remains unsatisfactory, and that analysis of the evolving post-September 11 security environment lends greater weight to classical realist explanations than it does a true clash of civilizations. It also argues that Huntington is correct in identifying culture as a motivating force for conflict on the intra-state level of analysis, and that a clash of cultures remains possible if Europe, the US, and the Middle East unwisely interpret their interests in cultural/civilizational terms. The chapter begins by briefly examining the relationship between culture and power, before moving on to consider whether 9/11 has resulted in policy shifts in Europe and the US conducive to a civilizational clash, taking into account issues of identity, interests, and alliances. The disunity in Islamic civilization is also linked to pragmatic issues relating to national interests and power.

Chat with Paper

AI Agents for this Paper