Comparison of Different Methods for Estimating Log-normal Means

Open AccessArticle

Comparison of Different Methods for Estimating Log-normal Means

Qi Tang-2014-01-01-Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University)

TL;DRAbstract

The log-normal distribution is a popular model in many areas, especially in biostatistics and survival analysis where the data tend to be right skewed. In our research, a total of ten different estimators of log-normal means are compared theoretically. Simulations are done using different values of parameters and sample size. As a result of comparison, ``A degree of freedom adjusted" maximum likelihood estimator and Bayesian estimator under quadratic loss are the best when using the mean square error (MSE) as a criterion. The ten estimators are applied to a real dataset, an environmental study from Naval Construction Battalion Center (NCBC), Super Fund Site in Rhode Island.

Chat with Paper

AI Agents for this Paper

The log-normal distribution is a popular model in many areas, especially in biostatistics and survival analysis where the data tend to be right skewed. In our research, a total of ten different estimators of log-normal means are compared theoretically. Simulations are done using different values of parameters and sample size. As a result of comparison, ``A degree of freedom adjusted" maximum likelihood estimator and Bayesian estimator under quadratic loss are the best when using the mean square error (MSE) as a criterion. The ten estimators are applied to a real dataset, an environmental study from Naval Construction Battalion Center (NCBC), Super Fund Site in Rhode Island.

Keywords

EstimatorStatisticsMathematicsMean squared errorBayesian probabilitySample size determinationQuadratic equationMaximum likelihood

Chat

Click to start Chat