Plato's arithmological theory of <i>eidē</i> : the second pillar of the ancient precedent to pure phenomenology

TL;DRAbstract

The dialogues' second account of the eidē is neither readily apparent nor Socratic. In place of the dramatic figures of the philosopher Socrates and various non-philosophers, the figure of the unnamed philosopher from Elea (the “Stranger”) and the accomplished mathematician Theaetetus pursue to its end – to be sure in the presence of and at the initiative of Socrates – the “right use” of the technē proper to counting and calculation for redirecting the whole soul to the source of being and truth. In other words, they complete in deed what is merely prescriptive in the Socratic account of the eidē. Their dialectically imageless investigation of the eidē, and, more precisely, of the “greatest” (most original) “kinds” (genē), is presented in a manner in which the inexactness of the images belonging to Socratic myth is superseded by the exactness of number and the one. (In the Cratylus, Socrates calls attention to the crucial difference in exactness between an image and a number by pointin

Chat with Paper

AI Agents for this Paper