CitedEvidence
User Settings
Open AccessArticle10.25892/5p7m-j477

Defending and De-fencing: Approaches for Understanding the Social Functions of Public Monuments and Memorials

Melanie L. Buffington,Erin E. Waldner-2012-01-01-VCU Scholars Compass (Virginia Commonwealth University)

TL;DRAbstract

This article explores two possible meanings of de(fence) as related to historical monuments and memorials. By interpreting this term as both defense (defending and idealizing the past) and de-fence (taking down fences and opening narratives about the past), we develop ways to understand potential social functions of monuments. Through the specific examples of the Lee Monument in Richmond, Virginia and Shoes on the Danube Bank in Budapest, Hungary, we describe how the ideas of defense and de-fence function. Further, this article also touches upon temporary interventions to monuments including graffiti and yarn bombing.

Chat with Paper

AI Agents for this Paper

This article explores two possible meanings of de(fence) as related to historical monuments and memorials. By interpreting this term as both defense (defending and idealizing the past) and de-fence (taking down fences and opening narratives about the past), we develop ways to understand potential social functions of monuments. Through the specific examples of the Lee Monument in Richmond, Virginia and Shoes on the Danube Bank in Budapest, Hungary, we describe how the ideas of defense and de-fence function. Further, this article also touches upon temporary interventions to monuments including graffiti and yarn bombing.

Keywords

GraffitiSculptureVisual artsArtSociologyHistoryAesthetics

Chat

Click to start Chat