CitedEvidence
User Settings
Open AccessArticle

Public Decision-Making as Coevolution

Lasse Gerrits-2010-07-13-Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
12

TL;DRAbstract

markdownabstractThe main argument of this article is that public decision-making has an anthropocentric focus that lacks explanatory power. An alternative approach is suggested. This approach reframes decision-making as a process of coevolution between decision-makers and the system they attempt to govern. 
\nCoevolution can explain the occurrence of unintended, unforeseen and unwanted consequences of decisions. The framework is applied to analyze a case of planning port extensions in Hamburg, Germany, in order to demonstrate the workings of the coevolutionary approach
\nto public decision-making processes.

Chat with Paper

AI Agents for this Paper

markdownabstractThe main argument of this article is that public decision-making has an anthropocentric focus that lacks explanatory power. An alternative approach is suggested. This approach reframes decision-making as a process of coevolution between decision-makers and the system they attempt to govern. 
\nCoevolution can explain the occurrence of unintended, unforeseen and unwanted consequences of decisions. The framework is applied to analyze a case of planning port extensions in Hamburg, Germany, in order to demonstrate the workings of the coevolutionary approach
\nto public decision-making processes.

Keywords

CoevolutionAnthropocentrismBlamePerspective (graphical)Order (exchange)Management scienceSatisficingCausation

Chat

Click to start Chat