Reply to “Comment on ‘Inference with minimal Gibbs free energy in information field theory’ ”
TL;DRAbstract
We endorse the comment on our recent paper [En\ss{}lin and Weig, Phys. Rev. E 82, 051112 (2010)] by Iatsenko, Stefanovska, and McClintock [Phys. Rev. E 85, 033101 (2012)], and we try to clarify the origin of the apparent controversy on two issues. The aim of the minimal Gibbs free energy approach to provide a signal estimate is not affected by their Comment. However, if one wants to extend the method to also infer the a posteriori signal uncertainty, any tempering of the posterior has to be undone at the end of the calculations, as they correctly point out. Furthermore, a distinction is made here between maximum entropy, the maximum entropy principle, and the so-called maximum entropy method in imaging, hopefully clarifying further the second issue of their Comment.
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
We endorse the comment on our recent paper [En\ss{}lin and Weig, Phys. Rev. E 82, 051112 (2010)] by Iatsenko, Stefanovska, and McClintock [Phys. Rev. E 85, 033101 (2012)], and we try to clarify the origin of the apparent controversy on two issues. The aim of the minimal Gibbs free energy approach to provide a signal estimate is not affected by their Comment. However, if one wants to extend the method to also infer the a posteriori signal uncertainty, any tempering of the posterior has to be undone at the end of the calculations, as they correctly point out. Furthermore, a distinction is made here between maximum entropy, the maximum entropy principle, and the so-called maximum entropy method in imaging, hopefully clarifying further the second issue of their Comment.
Keywords
Chat
Click to start Chat