User Settings
Open AccessArticle10.60082/2817-5069.1584

Legal Education: Nemesis or Ally of Social Movements?

Janet Mosher-1997-07-01-Osgoode Hall law journal

TL;DRAbstract

There is much in legal education which contributes to lawyering practices that are fundamentally at odds with the formation of social movements. These practices include the "individualization" of client problems; the reshaping of the realities of clients' lives into legal categories or boxes; the commitment to instrumentalism (that is, to securing a favourable legal result); and lawyer domination and control and the correlates of client silence and passivity. The genesis for these features of dominant lawyering practices can be traced, at least in part, to legal education. More specifically, legal education's emphasis upon doctrinal analysis, its tendency to trade upon an existing stock of legal categories or stories, and the relative inattention paid to fundamental critiques of the status quo contribute to these lawyering practices.

Chat with Paper

AI Agents for this Paper

There is much in legal education which contributes to lawyering practices that are fundamentally at odds with the formation of social movements. These practices include the "individualization" of client problems; the reshaping of the realities of clients' lives into legal categories or boxes; the commitment to instrumentalism (that is, to securing a favourable legal result); and lawyer domination and control and the correlates of client silence and passivity. The genesis for these features of dominant lawyering practices can be traced, at least in part, to legal education. More specifically, legal education's emphasis upon doctrinal analysis, its tendency to trade upon an existing stock of legal categories or stories, and the relative inattention paid to fundamental critiques of the status quo contribute to these lawyering practices.

Keywords

InstrumentalismStatus quoLegal realismLegal statusPolitical scienceLegal educationSilenceRedress

Chat

Click to start Chat